Skip to main content

Malls as Public Space





India’s urban growth story has been accompanied by the growth in consumerism. And Malls are the most visual landmarks of the new consumerist society. In fact, malls have doubled in the past 5 years in spite of the slowing economy. With malls becoming such an important part of the urban landscape they deserve serious and critical analysis, and not be dismissed as yet another passing fad. Being a western invention, it is no wonder that most malls look like alien spaces in the midst of Indian cities. The success of malls can be partly credited to the clean, posh environment for shopping, eating and entertainment, and partly credited to the loss of quality public spaces in Indian cities. Traditionally, these functions (shopping, eating and entertainment) were carried out on the streets and chowks of Indian cities in turn becoming an integral part of the urban drama.

With growing privatization, an increasingly capitalist economy and a growing consumerist society, malls present a serious competition to the city’s already dwindling public spaces. The Indian urban culture is going through a massive change, and it becomes a point of debate if malls are following the crowd or the crowd is following the mall. Whatever the answer, the fact is that malls now dot our urban landscape and are becoming an integral part of our social (and cultural) life. They have become identities and landmarks of their respective districts, and are at the centre of today’s urban life. Malls are being used as meeting points, spaces to celebrate, to hang out with friends, date, work, play, (and one mall even allows morning walkers inside before the mall opens) ….. all in a secure, climatically controlled, professionally managed indoor environment. A mall becomes a one-stop, all-under-one-roof maga-space where I can shop, eat, play, get entertained and relax. The mall has replaced the shopping street, the chowk, the nukkad, the maidan. So does this make malls the new “Public Space”?

The success of a mall is based on the footfalls and revenue generated, and there is hardly any critique on the urban design aspects. Catering mainly to car-owners the “urban face” of malls only gives a sideways glance to pedestrians and almost turns a blind eye to the streetscape.  Then, how can a space be termed as a “Public Space” if it does not become an integral part of the public realm or even acknowledge it? The problem lies not so much inside the mall as outside it. Most malls, by virtue of their inherent genetic character turn their backs to the city, presenting huge blank facades that can only be used for advertisements and billboards. Malls are designed as an inward-looking, insular spaces because their success depends largely on the make-believe, perfect environment within that is diametrically opposite the polluted, chaotic real city outside. Malls thrive on the citizens’ aspirations to escape the real city.


Mall designers have perfected the art and science of shopping and created formulae that are being duplicated throughout the world. This formula is based on a primary assumption of man as a consumer rather than a social being. A person in a mall is primarily a consumer of brands, and a person on the street is primarily a social being. The activity of shopping, eating and entertainment is as much a social activity as one of consumerism. Charles Correa’s design of the City Centre Mall at Salt Lake City, Kolkata is an attempt to integrate the mall into the urban-scape and be a celebration of the social aspects of our society rather than celebrating only consumerism. It is time architects and urban designers in India re-evaluate the Mall within the context of Indian cities and make them an integral part of the Indian urban landscape in the true sense.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Architecture - An Impure Art, an Inexact Science

Many of you would not disagree with the statement that Architecture is combination of Art and Science. If Frank Lloyd Wright proclaimed Architecture as the “Mother of all Arts”, then why not the “Mother of all Sciences”? Why has the mother embraced one child and forsaken the other? The Oxford English dictionary defines Art as: “The expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power.” The Oxford English Dictionary defines Science as: “The intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment.” Art in its pure form appeals to our sense of the ideal and our highest aspirations, experienced through passion and instinct. Whereas Science in its pure form tries to understand nature and the environment by ...
2 comments
Read more

Layermag

This is one of the few web-sites dedicated to South Asian architecture and architects. Though in it's nascent stages of development, I think it holds the potential to be the spearhead of an oncoming change. Web-sites and resources like these are quite necessary and useful to make people aware about contemporary and future movements in the South Asian region. "LAYER finds its roots in diversity. It was born out of a common desire to launch a platform for interaction, exposure and participation of South Asian designers, at all stages to experience and share their ideologies, which will help evolve the present status quo. LAYER indulges in all aspects of design and art. The nature of exhibitions, curational strategies and publications, demands new interrogation and reconsideration. This is fueled by the fact that in recent years, worlds of art, architecture and design have outgrown their modes of representation and production, and have started to cannibalize neighboring discip...
Post a Comment
Read more

Affordable Housing in Mumbai

Affordable Housing is one of the most important issues for Mumbai's development. due to its complex and dynamic nature it is a big challenge for the Government, urban planner and all stakeholders. In Mumbai, approximately 42% of the people live in slums and about 57% households live in one-room tenements, with 9 out of 24 wards with more than 50% slum population. (Census 2011) Affordability is a relative concept. It means different things to different people. But then how do we define Affordability? A high-level Task Force on Affordable Housing for All, set up by the Government of India in 2008, and headed by Deepak Parekh, has put forth the following definition of affordable housing: (http://www.naredco.in/pdfs/report-high-level-task.pdf) For EWS/ LIG: ≤ 4 years of income or EMI/ Rent ≤ 30% of gross monthly income For MIG: ≤ 5 years income or EMI/ Rent ≤ 40% of gross monthly income Currently the two approaches being adopted to address the issue of affordable housi...
Post a Comment
Read more