Skip to main content

Smart Cities and the Mango People


The Government is making massive efforts to set the ball rolling on the Smart Cities program in India. ULBs are gearing up and creating SPVs and hiring consultants to make their pitch, and access the funds. Much seems to be happening in the background. Self-proclaimed "Smart City Gurus" seem to have sprung out of nowhere, and others are clamoring to get into the scene. International consultants, IT companies and Management wallahs have all jumped onto the bandwagon to make Indian cities "Smart".

But if you ask the man on the street about "Smart Cities", he will either give you a blank stare or utter something which is merely an aspect of the concept of Smart Cities. And you will experience the same reaction when conversing with a qualified Architect, Urban Planner or Urban Designer. That, or you might end up in an endless, pointless debate. The point is, in all this brouhaha where does the common-man-on-the-street fit in? Is he a part of this wave? There has been much literature on the technology aspects of Smart Cities, and all the implementation efforts focus around financing and funding. In all this, the citizens seem to have become the "neglected child" of parents who are too busy making money.

There is no denying that experts have the knowledge and know-how, but there should also be no denying that the citizens are the best source of the 'know-what' and 'know-why'. Smart Cities .... in fact all cities are for the people. As buildings, streets and transportation do not make a city (people do), similarly, only ICTs, sensors and apps do not make a Smart City. Then, aren't we repeating the mistakes of our modernist, centralized theories of urban planning where a single hand decided the fate of the multitude?

The absence of public debate and public participation in the making of Smart Cities in India is alarming. Most of the discussions and debates take place in the proverbial ivory tower and little trickles down to the ears of the "Mango People" (aam aadmi).


The Smart Cities initiative is a good opportunity to engage the citizens in a dialogue around city building and create awareness. Because an engaged people are a responsible people. The sense of being counted and mattered will in fact create a sense of stewardship towards their own cities, and therefore better the chances of the success of Smart Cities. Otherwise, it simply becomes a an exercise in business creation and not an exercise in city building. Smart Cities without active public participation is merely a business creation opportunity (at the expense of public interest and money).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Architecture for the Poor - Hassan Fathy

Hassan Fathy was a remarkable man: artist, antiquarian and social reformer to the world's poor. He was slightly built and enveloped by an air of virtuousness, projecting the intellectual vigour, tranquillity and inner calm reserved for the elect. These qualities, accompanied by a twinkle in his eye and a willingness to listen, made him a favourite of students, who responded to him with warmth and humour, and vied for his attention. Fathy's architectural and social ideas were based at first upon his colonial education, and only later moulded by a deep knowledge of his country's long history and in particular its architecture, which had often been controlled by mathematics and mystical geometries. Six general principles guided him throughout his career: the primacy of human values in architecture; the importance of a universal approach; the use of appropriate technology; the need for socially oriented, co-operative construction techniques; the essential role of tradition; and

Low Cost Housing in Sri Lanka

Currently I am involved in a project, with Hidaya Foundation , for designing and constructing low-cost housing for the victims of the tsunami in the Indian Ocean. As a non-profit organization founded in 1999, Hidaya Foundation has undertaken a mission to implement educational, social welfare, and charitable projects in economically depressed areas of Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, USA and Canada. The project involves designing, training and construction of houses for widows and orphans in the regions affected by the disaster. The idea is not only to build structures, but to build communities that are self-sufficient and sustainable. The main principles will be: 1. Use of local materials 2. Use of local labor 3. Training of locals in sustainable building technologies 4. Constructing communities that the people living there can associate themselves with 5. Managing within a very low budget The idea is to involve dedicated and willing volunteers who will learn the technology and train the l